Ludlum Enterprises, Inc. v. Deem Investment Corp.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We have reviewed the briefs and record on appeal and heard oral argument. On the basis thereof, we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been demonstrated. The judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed. See Arison Shipping Company v. Klosters Rederi A/S, Fla.App.1971, 259 So.2d 784; Edenfield v. Crisp, Fla.App.1966, 186 So.2d 545, arid Insurance Management, Inc. v. McLeod, Fla.App.1966, 194 So.2d 16.
Affirmed.
*389MAGER, J., and WHITE, JOSEPH S., Associate Judge, concur. WALDEN, J., dissents, with opinion.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Edenfield v. CrispDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Arison Shipping Company v. Klosters Rederi A/SDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- Insurance Management, Inc. v. McLeodDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ludlum Enterprises, Inc. v. Deem Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1972