Legal Opinion

Home Building & Loan Co. v. Rivers

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 5, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.

Appellant was complainant in the court below'and filed its bill against the appellees to foreclose'a mortgage. The mortgage was given to secure a note. A copy of the note and a copy of the mortgage were 'each attached to the bill of complaint and by apt words made a part thereof.

It was alleged that default had occurred in the payment of the note and the interest thereon, default in the payment of taxes and default in the payment of insurance premiums.

The bill of complaint did not comply with the requirements’ as stated in the case of Hemphill v. Nelson, 95, Fla. 498, 116 Sou. 498, as follows:

“…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lowrimore v. First Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
  2. Hemphill Et Ux. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  3. Routh v. RichardsSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  4. Savage v. RossSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  5. Edason v. Central Farmers' Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Perry v. Fairbanks Capital Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  2. Blackwell v. New Miami Shores Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API