Legal Opinion

City Railway Co. v. Friezell

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 14, 1935No. 1279PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*99OPINION

By BARNES, J.

Question No. 1.

“A. The record clearly shows plaintiff was contributorily negligent therefore verdict is against the evidence and the law.”

After a careful examination of the record, giving the testimony the most favorable construction to plaintiff’s contention, we are forced to the conclusion that the plaintiff Friezell was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. Plaintiff be glancing at the traffic light and ascertaining that it was green or “Go” for him, and not making any other observation for westbound traffic before taking his step or two into the car,…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Keller v. City Railway Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API