City Railway Co. v. Friezell
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*99OPINION
By BARNES, J.
Question No. 1.
“A. The record clearly shows plaintiff was contributorily negligent therefore verdict is against the evidence and the law.”
After a careful examination of the record, giving the testimony the most favorable construction to plaintiff’s contention, we are forced to the conclusion that the plaintiff Friezell was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. Plaintiff be glancing at the traffic light and ascertaining that it was green or “Go” for him, and not making any other observation for westbound traffic before taking his step or two into the car,…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Keller v. City Railway Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1948