Ryan v. Guilfoil
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, King County.—Hon. Alfred Battle, Judge pro tem.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the*court was delivered by
Dunbar, J.
The appellant John W. Hart and defendant O. D. Guilfoil entered into a written contract whereby Guilfoil agreed to deliver to Hart 30,000 fence posts of dimensions specified in the article of agreement which appears in exhibit in the case, and Hart agreed to pay Guilfoil therefor upon their delivery. Respondent Ryan had been employed by Guilfoil to haul said posts from the place where they were manufactured to the place where they were to be delivered to Hart. Guilfoil failing to pay him for his services, he brought an action for the same…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Billings v. Missoula White Pine Sash Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1930
- Forsberg v. LundgrenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- O'Brien v. Perfection Pile Preserving Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
- Sweem v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1900
- American Tie & Timber Co. v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.