Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Miner

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided January 15, 1903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Application, under section 2722 of the Code of Civil Procedure, by numerous creditors, for the payment of a pro rata share of their respective debts.

1Opinion of the Court

Woodbury, S.

The petitioners, sixty-eight in number, cred itors of the above-named deceased, make this application for the payment of a pro rata share of their respective claims under the *378provisions of section 2722 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The facts, so far as they have any material hearing on the case, are not disputed.

Letters of administration were granted May 7, 1902. The administrators caused an inventory and appraisal of the personal property to be made, which was filed in the surrogate’s office July 11, 1902, showing the value of the assets of the estate to be the .sum of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schutz v. . MoretteNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Lambert v. . CraftNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Magee v. VedderNew York Supreme Court · 1849
  4. Matter of Application, Etc., of MacAulayNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  5. Schmitz v. . LanghaarNew York Court of Appeals · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Voluntary Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of NelsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1909
  2. Weser Bros., Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API