Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State ex rel. Thrapp v. Noble Circuit Court

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1963No. 30,348Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Concurring and Dissenting Opinion

Jackson, C. J.

— This is an original action instituted to prohibit the respondent court and judge from certifying this cause to the Supreme Court and to mandate the respondent to rule on the defendant’s second application for change of venue from the judge.

I concur in that part of the majority opinion holding that the respondent judge could not disqualify himself under the provisions of Rule 1-12(11), as it is obvious he does not come within the purview of that section of the Rule.

I dissent from the remainder of the opinion for the following reasons:

*570. 1. : The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Thrapp v. Noble Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API