Katherine S. v. Foreman
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLEINSCHMIDT, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 This special action challenges the constitutionality of Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) section 8-235, the statute that gives the juvenile court the power to direct and control the behavior of any person whose conduct may be detrimental or harmful to a juvenile who is under the jurisdiction of the court. The petitioner, Katherine S., is the sister of a juvenile who had been adjudicated delinquent. The court entered certain orders directing and controlling Katherine’s conduct, and she objected and filed this special action. We grant relief…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brush & Nib v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 2019
- Brush & Nib v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 2019