Legal Opinion

Katherine S. v. Foreman

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 30, 1999No. 1 CA-SA 98-0328PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLEINSCHMIDT, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 This special action challenges the constitutionality of Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) section 8-235, the statute that gives the juvenile court the power to direct and control the behavior of any person whose conduct may be detrimental or harmful to a juvenile who is under the jurisdiction of the court. The petitioner, Katherine S., is the sister of a juvenile who had been adjudicated delinquent. The court entered certain orders directing and controlling Katherine’s conduct, and she objected and filed this special action. We grant relief…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brush & Nib v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Brush & Nib v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API