Legal Opinion

Rothbart v. Rothbart

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 29, 1996No. 94-620PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorton, J.

The plaintiff, David Rothbart, appeals the order of the Superior Court (Gray, J.) approving the qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) submitted by the defendant, Susan Rothbart. We affirm.

This property settlement case involves the apportionment of the plaintiff’s defined benefit pension plan and the interpretation of our decision in Hodgins v. Hodgins, 126 N.H. 711, 497 A.2d 1187 (1985) (superseded on other grounds by RSA 458:16-a, I (1992)). in Hodgins, we held that under certain circumstances, the apportionment of future pension benefits may be determined according to a formula. Id. at…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hodgins v. HodginsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  2. Hillebrand v. HillebrandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  3. Baker v. BakerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  4. Public Service Co. v. Town of SeabrookSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  5. Holliday v. HollidaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In re WatterworthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  2. In Re CostaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  3. In re ValenceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  4. Shaheen, Cappiello, Stein & Gordon, P.A. v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  5. Hoffman v. HoffmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API