Legal Opinion

Foster v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 11, 1928No. 11236Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

On direct examination the testimony of Carl Miller, the alleged purchaser, was positive that he purchased whisky from Guy Foster, the appellant. On cross-examination he admitted that out of court he had claimed that he got the whisky from another party named Rawley, and did not at that time state that he got it from Guy Foster, but that when he learned that he would be prosecuted for transporting whisky, he told the truth about the matter, namely, that he bought the whisky from Foster.

In his motion for rehearing the appellant insists that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Green v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Galaviz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Duckworth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API