Pulos v. Pulos
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.
The trial court made an order requiring Aleck Pulos, defendant, to pay to R. R. Watson, guardian ad litem of Hettie Alma Pulos, an incompetent person, $100 per month pendente lite for support, $25 costs, and $350 as attorney’s fees. Defendant appeals from this order.
An action for divorce was instituted on behalf of Hettie by her guardian ad litem seeking a division of community property, support, costs, and attorney’s fees. In a second cause of action it was alleged that the parties had made a property settlement agreement, that Hettie had executed to defendant a deed to certain real property…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Scott v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Cohen v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Greenwood v. GreenwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Neblett v. NeblettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schuck v. MyersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Jones v. MincWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- Jones v. MincWashington Supreme Court · 1969