Legal Opinion

Foote v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 26, 1883PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal, as up on Writ of Error, from the Criminal Court of Baltimore City.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This case comes before us upon a writ of error from the Criminal Court of Baltimore City.

The plaintiff in error, Foote, was indicted in that Court under the Act of 1882, ch. 120, for brutally assaulting and heating his. wife, found guilty and sentenced to imprisonment in jail, for sixty days, and to he whipped seven lashes by the sheriff. He assigns for causes of error that the Act of 1882, chap. 120, is unconstitutional (in so far as it imposes the penalty of whipping) for the following reasons:

1st. That it is in contravention of the 16th and 25th Articles of the Bill of Rights of Maryland,…

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. Weems v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Dutton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1914
  3. State v. HoustonUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Walker v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  5. Bartholomey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API