Legal Opinion · Dissent

John Rooff & Sons, Inc. v. Winterbottom

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 12, 1957No. 49203Published

1DissentHays, C. J.

I respectfully dissent.

Being a law action, this court is limited to the correction of errors in the trial court. Rule 334, R. C. P. The trial court directed a verdict as to defendant’s pleaded setoff in his answer and dismissed his counterclaim which was stated in two counts. In the setoff and , count 1 of the counterclaim the defendant pleaded as follows: “* * * while certain employees * * * of the plaintiff * * * were performing certain repair and construction work * * * said * * * employee # * * so carelessly and. negligently operated an acetylene [electric] cutting or welding torch as to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Shinofield v. CurtisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  2. Orr v. Des Moines Electric Light Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  3. Highland Golf Club of Iowa Falls v. Sinclair Refining Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1945
  4. Dodge v. McFallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  5. Volquardsen v. Iowa Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API