Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Hurley

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 12, 1994PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Liacos, CJ.

The respondent, Edmund M. Hurley, appeals from an order of a single justice suspending him indefinitely from the practice of law in the Commonwealth. We consider whether indefinite suspension is the appropriate sanction to impose on an attorney convicted of the felony of conspiracy to defraud the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (1988). We conclude that it is. Therefore, we affirm.

We summarize the facts underlying this disciplinary action as they were submitted to us in an information filed in the county court by the Board of Bar Overseers (Board). The respondent was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In the Matter of AlterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. United States v. Edmund M. Hurley, United States v. Charles R. BurnettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  3. In the Matter of PalmerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  4. In the Matter of NeitlichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  5. In the Matter of KnoxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re ConcemiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  2. In re FinnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  3. In re DoyleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  4. In re KennedyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  5. In re CurryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API