Legal Opinion

Splint v. Sullivan

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Hannibal Court of Common Pleas.— Hon. R. E. Rot, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBond, J.

James B. Sullivan, a merchant at Hannibal, Missouri, on December 26, 1891, executed a chattel mortgage on his stock of 1 ‘ary goods and notions,” contained in two stores in said city, to secure the payment of two certain promissory notes, viz., one note made by the mortgagor to Josephine Splint, November 23, 1891, for $500 payable thirty days thereafter with interest at eight per cent;, and another note by same maker to Farmers’ and Merchants’ Bank for $2,000, dated October 5,1891, due sixty days thereafter with interest after maturity. Said mortgage contained a defeasance clause, upon…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Union Bank of Chicago v. Kansas City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Hargadine v. HendersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  3. Jacobi v. JacobiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  4. Jaffrey v. MathewsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  5. Riddle v. NorrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re SchindlerDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1963
  2. Sikes v. ChaneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API