Legal Opinion

Anil Kumar v. Warden of the Golden State Annex Detention Facility

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 11, 2025No. 1:25-cv-01709Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANIL KUMAR, No. 1:25-cv-01709-DAD-EFB (HC) 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 WARDEN OF THE GOLDEN STATE ANNEX DETENTION FACILITY, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, an immigration detainee who is representing himself, filed a petition for a writ 18 of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis 19 is granted. 20 The court has conducted a preliminary review of the petition pursuant to Rule 4 of the 21 Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254.1 In…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Dean Foods Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. New York v. 11 Cornwell Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API