Legal Opinion

California Zinc Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 7, 1947No. 47594PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitaker, Judge

This case is before us on defendant’s demurrer grounded on a misjoinder of parties and of causes of action.

Plaintiff California Zinc Company was the owner of some zinc mines in the State of California and plaintiff Railway Company was the owner of a railroad from the mines to Pitt Station in the State of California. It is alleged that a large part of the mines and practically all of the railway either have been or necessarily will be inundated by the back waters caused by the erection of the Shasta Dam in California. Each of the plaintiffs sue for the taking of their property. Defendant says…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. LoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. United States v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Gulf Oil Corp. v. LewellynSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Volasco Products Co. v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
  2. South Porto Rico Sugar Corp. v. Junta AzucareraSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963
  3. Dobyns-Taylor Hardware Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1967
  4. South Porto Rico Sugar Corp. v. Sugar BoardSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963
  5. Volasco Products Company v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Company, Volunteer Asphalt Company v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Company, Volasco Products Company v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API