Legal Opinion
Edmonds v. Heil
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided February 17, 1948No. Gen. No. 44,060PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sullivan
By this appeal defendants, George Heil and Myrtle G. Heil, seek to reverse a judgment foils,200 entered against them and in favor of Robert S. Edmonds. > The defendants filed a separate appeal, Appellate Court General Number 44061 [p. 648, infra], from a judgment for $5,500 entered against them and in favor of George S. Robinson. These two appeals have been consolidated for hearing in this court.
A single complaint was filed by the plaintiffs, Edmonds and Robinson, against Florence K. Burnham and her agents, George Heil and Myrtle G.- Heil, to recover damages for the destruction of their…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Throckmorton v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Lord v. Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- McClure v. Hoopeston Gas & Electric Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1922
- Feldman v. Chicago Railways Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1919
- Oakdale Building Corp. v. Smithereen Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Ciomber v. Cooperative Plus, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Miller v. Town of AnkenySupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
- Collgood, Inc. v. Sands Drug Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1972
- Dodge v. McFallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
- Hahn v. Eastern Illinois Office Equipment Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.