Legal Opinion

Succession of Alexander

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 3, 1903No. 14,649PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; Thomas C. W. Ellis, Judge. In the matter of the succession of Mary Jane Alexander. From a judgment amending the final account of the administrator and allowing certain accounts, the administrator appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMonroe, J.

Tbe administrator of tbis succession appeals- from a judgment ordering the amendment of his final account, and complains that the judge a quo erred in increasing ' the amount allowed Mrs. M. O. Leroy from $5 to $20, and in allowing Mrs. Langlumé, represented by her husband, George Langlumé, more than she is entitled to.

Mrs. Leroy presented a bill to the administrator for $15 for washing the corpse of the deceased and preparing it for burial. She was placed on the account for $5, whereupon she filed an opposition claiming $60, whereof $45 is for nursing. It is shown that the usual charge for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Vaughn v. TerrellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1871

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Succession of BierceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  2. Toler v. MunsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Brown v. Succession of LaingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Succession of DolsenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  5. Baumann v. Succession of VillaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API