Legal Opinion

Cahill Swift Manufacturing Co. v. Hayes

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 8, 1916No. 20,087PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Sedgwick district court, division No. 2; Thornton W. Sargent, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*741The opinion of the court was delivered by

DAWSON, J.:

The plaintiff company sued T. P. Hayes and Louis M. Clark in the city court of Wichita, alleging that the defendants were partners and indebted to it for a sum of money for which it asked judgment.

The city judge, whose jurisdiction is much like that of a justice of the peace, issued summons directing defendant Hayes to appear at 8 o’clock a. m., on October 8, 1913. Hayes appeared and remained until 9 o’clock, when the cases set for that date were called. The case against Hayes was not called. The attorney for Hayes asked the judge if there…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Frazier v. DouglassSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  2. Neosho Valley Investment Co. v. CornellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  3. Brady v. TaberMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  4. True v. MendenhallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  5. Thompson v. PfeifferSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Schuckman v. RubensteinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  2. N. A. Kennedy Butter Tub Co. v. First & Hamilton National Bank of Fort WayneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  3. In Re HonakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Jaramillo v. State Ex Rel. Board of County Com'rsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Smith v. JukesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API