Legal Opinion
Changzhou Laosan Group v. US CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION BUREAU
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 17, 2005No. CIV.A.04-1919(ESH)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HUVELLE, District Judge.
Defendant has moved for reconsideration of the Court’s April 20, 2005 Memorandum Opinion and Order that rejected defendant’s invocation of FOIA’s Exemption 4 to withhold documents pertaining to the seizure of plaintiffs merchandise. In light of undisputed evidence that some of the documents previously analyzed under the test for involuntarily submitted documents were, in fact, voluntarily submitted, the Court has reconsidered its prior decision in order to prevent manifest injustice to the innocent third parties that submitted the information. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Critical Mass Energy Project v. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- National Parks and Conservation Association v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary, Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Cna Financial Corporation v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. United States Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Center for Auto Safety v. National Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Delta Ltd. v. U.S. Customs & Border Protection BureauDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- 100reporters v. U.S. Department of StateDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021