Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Karen Olson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 15, 2017No. 15-30022Published

1ConcurrenceHurwitz, Circuit Judge

This case does not turn on whether the government must prove in a misprision prosecution under 18 U.S.C. § 4 that the defendant knew the underlying offense was a felony. As the majority correctly concludes, the evidence at trial sufficed for a misprision conviction even if the government bears that burden of proof.

The majority’s interpretation of the statute may be correct. But, I would leave such analysis for another day, in a case in which it matters to the outcome. See Whitehouse v. Ill. Cent. R. Co., 349 U.S. 366, 372-73, 75 S.Ct. 845, 99 L.Ed. 1155 (1955) (“These are perplexing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Whitehouse v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. PDK Laboratories Inc. v. United States Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API