Legal Opinion

Hayes v. S. Stroock & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 31, 1954PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBergau, J.

The issue of law here before us is to determine

whether there is substantial evidence, when the is considered as a whole, to support an award by the Workmen’s Compensation Board. The law problem that thus arises on what is “ substantial ” medical proof when the case is seen as an entity is in an area not easily defined.

Records which have not been regarded as providing substantial evidence in support of awards are of some help in casting the line, but each case brings with it its own need for evaluation of whether the proof, including the opinion evidence of the physicians, gives substantial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Claim of Kopec v. Buffalo Brake Beam-Acme Steel & Malleable Iron WorksNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Claim of Peploe v. Burns Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Claim of Backstrom v. Turner Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  2. Brooks v. Temple SinaiNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Claim of Barrow v. Malone Telegram, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
  4. Claim of McGuinn v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  5. Claim of Sleator v. National City BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API