Stipanovich v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hoffman, J.,
The question for us to determine in the instant case is whether Westinghouse Electric Corporation (Westinghouse) was a statutory employer of appellee, Daniel Stipanovich, under the provisions of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act. Before setting forth the facts in this case, however, we consider it advisable to review the applicable principles of law.
The status of statutory employer was created under §203 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act which provides : “An employer who permits the entry upon premises occupied by him or under his control of a laborer or an…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McDonald v. Levinson Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Qualp v. James Stewart Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Howard Jamison, Administrator of the Estate of Jesse Click, Deceased v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
3Cited by40 opinions
- William Rolick v. Collins Pine Company and Collins Pine Company, T/d/b/a Kane Hardwood DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Hattersley v. BolltCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Peck v. Delaware County Board of Prison InspectorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Shamis v. James Moon C/O Geppert Brothers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Pastore v. Anjo Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.