Legal Opinion

People v. Weissinger

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 26, 1980No. 79-704PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE SEIDENFELD

delivered the opinion of the court:

The State has appealed from a pretrial order which suppressed the analysis of blood taken from defendant without his consent following an accident which led to an indictment charging him with reckless homicide.

While a question had been raised whether the trial court suppressed the evidence on statutory or constitutional grounds, the distinction does not affect appealability pursuant to the recent Illinois Supreme Court case of People v. Young (1980), 82 Ill. 2d 234.

The blood sample was taken on the initiative of a doctor at…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. YoungIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. People v. ToddIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Murray v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. People v. LeffewAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. TomaselloAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. People v. KenningAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  3. Thomas v. BrandtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  4. Schantz v. Hodge-VonDeBurAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  5. People v. HartwickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API