Legal Opinion

Mertens v. Division of Consumer Services, State, Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 9, 1992No. 91-2803Published

1Opinion of the Court

ERVIN, Judge.

Judith Mertens appeals a non-final order denying her motion for protective order in which she sought to exercise her right, under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments of the United States Constitution, to decline to produce documentation of certain transactions of her sole proprietorship, General Unlimited Leasing Factors (GULF). We treat the appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari, grant the petition, and quash the order below.

On June 3, 1991, the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Consumer Services (“division”), sued Mer-tens individually and doing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Briggs v. SalcinesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  4. Nach v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Medical ExaminersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API