Chambers v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Concurrence
PARKS, Judge,
specially concurring:
I write separately to address appellant’s contention that the trial court committed fundamental error in instructing the jury to enhance under the general enhancement provisions of 21 O.S.1981, § 51, rather than the specific enhancement provisions of 21 O.S.Supp.1982, § 801. The specific enhancement provisions of Section 801 are triggered by conviction of three (3) separate and distinct violations of Section 801. Sealy v. State, 738 P.2d 521, 524 (Okla.*539Crim.App.1987). In Ellis v. State, 749 P.2d 114, 116 (Okla.Crim.App.1988), this Court held that “where a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ellis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988
- Blunt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987
- Sealy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987