Legal Opinion

Metz v. G. J. S. Realty Corp.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 22, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The defense designated as a “ Complete Defense ’ ’ herein is not one which completely defeats the cause of action. Since defendant has admitted an overcharge, although less than that claimed by plaintiff, the cause of action may not be dismissed for in any event plaintiff would at least be entitled to recover that amount. Nor does the tender of the check for $231.42 prior to the commencement of this action constitute a complete defense. The failure to accept the tender would serve only to deprive plaintiff of an award of statutory costs should there eventually be a recovery by plaintiff for…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tusch v. LindquistCity of New York Municipal Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API