Legal Opinion

Catherine E. Brochu v. Richard A. McLeod

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 20, 2016No. Docket: Cum-15-427PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMead, J.

[¶ 1] Catherine E. Brochu, formerly known as Catherine McLeod, appeals from an order of the District Court (Portland, Eggerb, J.) granting, based on the affirmative defense of laches, Richard A. McLeod’s motion to dismiss Brochu’s motion to enforce nearly forty years’ overdue child and spousal support payments. On appeal, Brochu contends that the court erred by (1) concluding that laches is a viable defense in child or spousal support cases; (2) finding that the elements of lach-es were satisfied; and (3) interpreting the parties’ settlement agreement to limit the term of spousal support to…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Christianson v. ElySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. State, Department of Revenue, Child Support Enforcement Division, Ex Rel. Valdez v. ValdezAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Hammond v. HammondWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Department of Human Services v. BellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Anne M. McBride v. Jeffrey R. WorthSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
  2. McBride v. WorthSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
  3. Teele v. West-HarperSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  4. Donald J. Williams v. Linda WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  5. Dunwoody v. DunwoodySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API