Legal Opinion

In Re Frottier

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.

Decided June 12, 1991No. 19-12806PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

A. JAY CRISTOL, Bankruptcy Judge.

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon a series of pro se motions seeking to proceed in forma pauperis. See Motion filed January 22, 1991, Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed April 3, 1991, and Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed April 8, 1991.

Section 1915, Title 28, United States Code, provides for proceeding in forma pauperis and permits the waiver of certain fees and costs or security upon one who seeks to proceed in such fashion. Notwithstanding 28 U.S.C. § 1915, Congress saw…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. KrasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Robert R. Bowen and Elizabeth S. Bowen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Matter of HubkaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nebraska · 1988

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Huff v. Brooks (In Re Brooks)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Alabama · 1994
  2. In Re KorenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. In Re RogersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992
  4. Burrell v. Letterlough (In Re Burrell)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992
  5. In Re StansburyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API