Legal Opinion

Arment v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 18, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cttetam.

There was a judgment rendered in the First District Court of Jersey City, by the trial judge, sitting without a jury, in favor of the plaintiff below, and against the defendant below, for the sum of $500.

The appeal is before us upon an agreement between the attorneys of the respective litigants, submitting the minutes and proceedings of the trial of the case, as a true transcript of the minutes and proceedings thereof, and agreeing that the same shall be the state of case for appeal.

The plaintiff’s action was brought upon a policy of “group insurance” issued by the appellant…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Lire Insurance v. PopeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  2. Woehr v. the Travelers Insurance Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API