Legal Opinion

Schenck v. Irwin

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Steuben county court. Action by Mathias Sehenck and another against Arthur B. Irwin. From an order vacating an order for the examination of Francis Irwin in proceedings supplementary to an execution on a judgment against defendant, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtDwight, P. J.

The judgment was docketed as a judgment of the county court of Steuben county, and an execution was issued out of that court to the sheriff of that county, where the judgment debtor then resided, and was returned unsatisBed. Thereafter the judgment debtor removed to Chemung county, and while he was residing there proceedings supplementary to the above execution were instituted before the county judge of Steuben county against the respondent, Francis Irwin, who was a resident of that county, as a person having property of the judgment debtor. He appeared pursuant to the order in those…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re GagnonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  2. Gladden v. ArchboldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  3. Lawyers' Title Insurance v. StantonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API