Legal Opinion
Wooten, Honeywell & Kest, PA v. Posner
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 22, 1990No. 89-2589PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
556 So.2d 1245 (1990)
WOOTEN, HONEYWELL & KEST, P.A., Petitioner,
v.
Lawrence K. POSNER, Respondent.
No. 89-2589.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
February 22, 1990.
D. Paul McCaskill, John F. Tannian, and David B. King of King & Blackwell, P.A., Orlando, for petitioner.
No Appearance, for respondent.
DAUKSCH, Judge.
This is before us on a petition for writ of certiorari to review an order compelling discovery. We issue a writ of certiorari and quash the order compelling discovery, as relates to all interrogatories but interrogatory 8. That one only asks for the identity of persons…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. SavageSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
3Cited by12 opinions
- Beverly Enterprises-Florida, Inc. v. IvesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Harborside HealthCare, LLC. v. JacobsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Caterpillar Indus., Inc. v. KeskesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Life Care Centers of America v. ReeseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Tanchel v. ShoemakerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.