Legal Opinion

In re the Will of Williams

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 22, 1939Published

1Opinion of the CourtClaeKSON, J.

In the present proceeding we are dealing with what is termed a holograph will — a creature of statute — N. C. Code, 1935 (Michie), sec. 4144 (2), which is as follows: “Wills and testaments must be admitted to probate only in the following manner: . . . (2) In the case of a holograph will, on the oath of at least three credible witnesses, who state that they verily believe such will and every part thereof is in the handwriting of the person whose will it purports to be,, and whose name must be subscribed thereto, or inserted in some part thereof. It must further appear on the oath of some one…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re WestfeldtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Harper v. . HarperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Winstead v. . BowmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
  4. Cornelius v. BrawleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  5. Hughes v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API