In re Whiting

—Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1978. He maintains an office for the practice of law in the City of Binghamton, Broome County.

Having granted a motion by petitioner for an order declaring that the petition of charges and respondent’s answer raised no factual issues and having subsequently heard respondent in mitigation, we now find respondent guilty of the following professional misconduct in violation of the attorney disciplinary rules (see 22 NYCRR part 1200). During 1999 and 2000, respondent issued checks and made wire transfers from his escrow account which…