Legal Opinion

United States v. John MacHibroda

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 20, 1964No. 15636_1PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

Prince v. United States, 352 U.S. 322, 77 S.Ct. 403, 1 L.Ed.2d 370 (1957) is directly in point and determines decision in the above-styled appeal. In Prince, the United States Supreme Court held that the first of two counts of the federal bank robbery statute (Title 18, U.S.C. § 2113(a) 1 — entering a bank with intent to steal) was included in and was merged into the second (Title 18, U.S.C. § 2113 (d) 2 — robbing a bank by force), and hence could not be the subject of a separate sentence.

The court said:

“The gravamen of the oifense is not in the act of entering, which satisfies the terms of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Heflin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Prince v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. George Edward Duggins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
  5. Hibdon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. United States v. Charles L. Canty, United States of America v. Charles M. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. United States v. Robert B. Corson, Eugene J. McCullough Eugene J. McCulloughCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
  3. United States v. Robert StevensCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  4. United States v. Henry McKenzie William Anthony. William AnthonyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
  5. Frank Leon Bryan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API