Brookshire v. Coffman
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
David Newbern, Justice.
This is a mortgage foreclosure case involving the question whether the note secured by the mortgage was usurious under the law preceding Amendment 60 to the Arkansas Constitution. More precisely, the question is whether one who takes an assignment of a note which was not usurious when it was made may recover on that note when the transaction by which he acquired it consisted, in part, of issuing other notes which were usurious. We agree with the chancellor’s decision that when assignment of the note was taken by the appellants’ decedent it became part of the usurious…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commercial Credit Plan, Inc. v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
- Garvin v. LintonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
- Hayes v. First National Bank of MemphisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
- McDermott v. StraussSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Hartzo v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dillon v. Resolution Trust Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1991