Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Doolittle

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1893PublishedCited by 10 opinions

cited Code (1868) c. 125, s. 46; 37 W. Ya. 598; Code (1891) c. 125, s. 46; 4 Rand. 152; Id. 413; 3 Leigh 270; 6 Rand. 102; 4 Min. Inst. 850, 854; 5 Graft. 137; 1 Rand. 25, 37; 12 Graft. 53; 23 W. Va. 483. cited Code, c. 124, s. 2; Id. c. 125, s. 15, 29; id. c. 134, s. 5; 4 Min. Inst. 648.

1Opinion of the Court

Dent, Judge :

On the 9th day of May, 1892, E. S. Doolittle, E. L Doolittle, and C. Molter, after notice given moved the Judge of the Circuit Court of Cabell county to set aside a judgment by default rendered by said court in favor of Joseph Anderson and against them for the sum of six hundred and thirty six dollars and twenty seven cents and costs, in a certain action of debt in .said court pending. The judge entered a vacation order overruling said motion, and the defendants in said action obtained a writ of error and rely on the following assignment of error:

“(1) The writ of inquiry awarded…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Beckwith v. MollohanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Roderick v. Railroad Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Ramsburg v. ErbWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Hinton v. BallardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Vinson v. Norfolk & W. R'y Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Snyder v. Philadelphia Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Varney & Evans v. Hutchinson Lumber & Mfg. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Hoag v. JeffersIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Smith's Adm'r v. Charlton's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1851
  5. McClure-Mabie Lumber Co. v. BrooksWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API