Legal Opinion

Diaz v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 10, 1929No. 12471PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

— The conviction is for the possession of a mash and still for the purpose of manufacturing intoxicating liquor; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of five years.

While looking for a Mexican named Antone Benevides, the officers were directed to a house on Mary Street in the City of Houston. One of the officers walked to the door for the purpose of making inquiry for Benevides and observed a still in operation. He walked away and called to his companion. When he returned to the house the appellant attempted to leave and was arrested. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. McLaughlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Sifuentes and Gonzales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Gonzales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Haynes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rippy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Moss v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Stone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API