Allen v. Allen

We conclude that the facts alleged in petitioner’s third motion for disqualification, taken as true, were sufficient to establish a well-grounded fear on the part of petitioner that she would not receive a fair -and impartial hearing before the trial judge. Accordingly, the petition for writ of prohibition is granted, and on remand, a new judge shall be assigned to hear further proceedings in this matter. '

KAHN, WEBSTER and BROWNING, JJ., concur. '