Legal Opinion

In Re the Sworn Application of Tiene

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 27, 1955PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Vanderbilt, C. J.

The problem before us arises out of a proceeding by 49 freeholders of Jersey City for a summary investigation into the financial affairs of Jersey City pursuant to B. 8. 40:6-l, the propriety of which was upheld by this court in Tiene v. Jersey City, 13 N. J. 478 (1953). Judge Haydn Proctor is the supervising judge of the statutory investigation and the respondent, Samuel A. Larner, is the expert appointed to prosecute the investigation. The appellants, Harry J. Thourot and Peter LaMort, are witnesses subpoenaed by this expert.

The…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re PilloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  2. Massett Building Co. v. BennettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  3. Mueller v. Seaboard Commercial Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  4. In Re Del Gobbo VinceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  5. Schlossberg v. Jersey City Sewerage AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re AddonizioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
  2. Lehrhaupt v. FlynnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  3. Band's Refuse Removal, Inc. v. Fair Lawn Bor.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  4. Cull v. VadnaisSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
  5. Burke v. Central Railroad Co. of NJNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API