Loffland Bros. v. Baca
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PIERCE, Judge.
This action consolidates the workmen’s compensation claims of three employees of Loffland Brothers Company injured in a single accident. Loffland Brothers and its insurer challenge the award of benefits. We affirm.
Loffland Brothers engaged in the business of drilling for oil and gas, and it is their practice to have their drilling employees assigned to a driller on a particular drilling rig. The employees are to remain with the driller on a particular drilling site until it is completed. If there is other work available at the completion of that job, they remain in the company’s…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. HowingtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
- JC Carlile Corporation v. AntakiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
3Cited by17 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. MessinaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Cross v. BOARD OF REVIEW OF INDUS. COM'NCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
- Varsity Contractors & Home Insurance Co. v. BacaColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
- Rodriguez v. PERMIAN DRILLING CORP.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
- Harkness v. McKay Oil Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.