Legal Opinion

Sanchez v. Village of Liberty

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1977PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. Order modified, without costs, and the complaint as to defendants Village of Liberty and John Como dismissed.

Absent a special relationship creating a municipal duty to exercise care for the benefit of a particular class of individuals, no liability may be imposed upon a municipality for *878failure to enforce a statute or regulation (Motyka v City of Amsterdam, 15 NY2d 134, 139; see Smullen v City of New York, 28 NY2d 66, 72). Because the statutes and ordinances involved in the case at bar create no such special relationship, no liability may be imposed. Nor may liability be imposed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Motyka v. City of AmsterdamNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Runkel v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  3. Smullen v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Runkel v. HomelskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Martinez v. Kaufman-Kane Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1974

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Garrett v. Holiday Inns, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Pelaez v. SeideNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Kenavan v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. O'Connor v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Platt v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API