Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Estes

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 9, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion-of the Court by

Judge Clarke

Affirming.

Alleging damage by reason of the failure of the defendant railroad company to furnish him with certain facilities for the loading and cars for shipment of coal, at its station at Roekhold, Ky., the plaintiff Estes recovered a judgment for $600.00, and the defendant has appealed.

For reversal it is insisted the court erred (1) in overruling- a demurrer to the petition, (2) in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant, and (3) in defining the measure of damages.

Assuming, as appellant contends, that section 783 of Kentucky Statutes imposes upon it…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. River & Rail Coal & Coke Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Broughton v. Louisville & Nashville RairoadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  2. Browning v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API