Legal Opinion

State Bank of Loretto v. Loose

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 30, 1936No. 30,967PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment.

On December 31, 1929, defendants were indebted to plaintiff in the sum of $1,500 evidenced by promissory note. To secure payment thereof they executed a chattel mortgage upon certain personal property. The mortgage ivas promptly and properly filed. Later, there being default under the terms and conditions of the mortgage, plaintiff proceeded to foreclose the same by notice. A sale was had and plaintiff bid in the property. To secure possession of the property so mortgaged and sold, or the value thereof if possession could not be had…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Steffens v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  2. Powell v. HardySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Aamot v. EneboeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Fidelity and Deposit Co. of Maryland v. RiopelleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. Aamot v. EneboeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API