Legal Opinion

Isaacs v. Bishop

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided March 14, 2008No. 06-05-00092-CVPublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Chief Justice MORRISS.

Using their wildest imagination, John and Susan Isaacs and Charles Bishop could not have predicted the unfortunate events which began when Isaacs contracted to sell the Hallsville Dragway to Bishop. That purchase contract was followed a few months later by a physical conflict which included Isaacs1 and Bishop, a subsequent punitive campaign by Isaacs against Bishop, and ultimately a pecuniary collapse by Bishop. From the resulting lawsuit, no party walked away happy.

The initial events are clear. Bishop purchased real and personal property known as the…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State Department of Highways & Public Transportation v. PayneTexas Supreme Court · 1992

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Wooley v. LucksingerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
  2. City of the Colony v. North Texas Municipal Water DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
  3. Villarreal v. Wells Fargo Brokerage Services, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
  4. Great Northern Energy, Inc. v. Circle Ridge Production, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  5. John Leeman Isaacs and Susan Gail Isaacs v. Robert G. Schleier, Jr., and Schleier & Brown, P.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2011

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API