Legal Opinion

Frazier v. Cropsey

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 8, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant Cropsey having commenced his occupancy with the permission of the tenant Leone, then entitled to possession, was not a squatter or an intruder within the provisions of subdivision 4 of section 1411 of the Civil Practice Act. The case of Williams v. Alt (170 N. Y. Supp. 506), affirmed by the Appellate Division (186 App. Div. 235) and later by the Court of Appeals (226 N. Y. 283), is decisive of the question here involved, and the learned trial court was in error in submitting the case to the jury. Since it appeared that the appellant had “ permission ” of the tenant Leone to take…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williams v. . AltNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Commonwealth Mortgage Co. v. De WaltoffAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909
  3. Williams v. AltAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stephen Estates, Inc. v. KaplanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1950
  2. Wright v. WrightCity of New York Municipal Court · 1946
  3. Stengel v. MoreheadAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1949
  4. Walderveen v. MartinAlbany City Court · 1949
  5. Cammarata v. FullerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API