Legal Opinion

Hickey v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 28, 1933No. 738PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.

The United States brought this action against J. G. Shoun to- recover certain funds . held by him as guardian of Frank Hickey.

During the pendency of the action, Frank Hickey arrived at his majority and filed therein his intervening petition, in which he claimed the funds in the hands of Shoun. The ease was disposed of on motion for judgment on the pleadings.

The pleadings disclose the following undisputed facts: Frank Hickey is a son of Adair Hickey, deceased. He was born September 21, 1910, subsequently to the Allotment Act, and was not an allotted member of the Osage…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCurdy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Taylor v. TayrienCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  3. Work v. United States Ex Rel. LynnSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Burgess v. NailCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  2. Whitchurch v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
  3. United States v. HughesDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Murray v. NedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
  5. Oklahoma ex rel. Commissioners of Land Office v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API