Anstead v. Cox Broadcasting
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Concurrence
ERVIN, Judge,
specially concurring.
I concur in affirming the deputy’s order solely because I feel bound by the rule stated in Apholz v. North American Van Lines, 427 So.2d 1094 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Coles v. Gainesville Bonded Warehouse, 409 So.2d 1205 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Silver Springs, Inc. v. Scardo, 408 So.2d 844 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), and their progeny, holding that an employee cannot utilize the method prescribed by section 440.14(l)(c), Florida Statutes, if he or she has in fact worked for *20013 weeks preceding the employee’s injury. Nevertheless, I disagree with the above cases because they…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Marston v. Gainesville Sun Pub. Co., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- Kerce v. Coca-Cola Company-Foods DivisionSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Silver Springs, Inc. v. ScardoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Coles v. Gainesville Bonded WarehouseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Tribune Co. v. SCHOOL BD. OF HILLSBOROUGH CTY.Supreme Court of Florida · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.