Legal Opinion

People v. DeSimone

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 25, 1998No. B111973PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COFFEE, J.

In this appeal, appellant Robert Frederick DeSimone challenges the calculation of his sentence under Penal Code section 667.61, the so-called “One Strike” law. We reject his argument that only one “multiple victim” finding under section 667.61, subdivision (e)(5) was permitted in this case, and affirm the judgment.

Factual Background

Appellant and D. married in 1991 and had two sons together. D.’s daughter Desiree, bom in 1985, also lived with the couple. The marriage started out well but deteriorated because D. would not acquiesce to appellant’s demands for oral sex. Appellant…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jones v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. People v. MeltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. People v. CoronadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. ManceboCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. People v. WutzkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. ValdezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. People v. Morales, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API