People v. DeSimone
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COFFEE, J.
In this appeal, appellant Robert Frederick DeSimone challenges the calculation of his sentence under Penal Code section 667.61, the so-called “One Strike” law. We reject his argument that only one “multiple victim” finding under section 667.61, subdivision (e)(5) was permitted in this case, and affirm the judgment.
Factual Background
Appellant and D. married in 1991 and had two sons together. D.’s daughter Desiree, bom in 1985, also lived with the couple. The marriage started out well but deteriorated because D. would not acquiesce to appellant’s demands for oral sex. Appellant…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Jones v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- People v. MeltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. CoronadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. ManceboCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. WutzkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. ValdezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. Morales, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.