Surety Savings & Loan Co. v. Kanzig
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWhiteside, J.
The issue in this cause is whether Surety can enforce its financing agreement with G-latt’s as against Wayne and the Kanzigs. Wayne has raised no issue with respect to indemnification of the Kanzigs, acceding thereto, and thus essentially stands in place of the Kanzigs.
The modular home ,in question, not having wheels or runners, is not a motor vehicle as defined by R. C. 4505.01 since it does not appear to be a vehicle as defined by R. C. *1114511.01(A), and thus not a house trailer as defined by E. C. 4501.01 (L). The parties, however, agree that the result in this case is not dependent upon…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Baldwin v. First National Bank of the Black HillsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Kirby v. Palos Verdes Escrow Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Leon Warrington v. Ray DawsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- First Bank v. Roslovic & Partners, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
- Roselawn Chiropractic Center, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.